President Donald Trump chose two nominees for the National Labor Relations Board whose commitment to the freedom of working people to come together and negotiate is seriously in doubt. These two men, Marvin Kaplan and William Emanuel, have records of actively trying to strip working people of their freedoms.
Republicans are rushing to get these nominations through, but it is imperative that the Senate¬†uses upcoming hearings and meetings to find out whether these nominees will side with working people or¬†the richest 1% of Americans.¬†NLRB decisions and actions¬†have a real impact on the lives of working people, particularly the ability to join together with co-workers to advocate for positive change.
Of the nominations, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said:
Marvin Kaplan has never practiced labor law, and his experience comes from crafting legislation for politicians that rigs the rules against working people. William Emanuel has a long record of practicing labor law on behalf of employers, most recently at one of the most infamous union-busting law firms in the country. On their face, the resumes of both nominees appear to be in direct conflict with the mission of the NLRB.
Emanuel, a member of the staunchly anti-working people legal organization,¬† the Federalist Society, has extensive experience representing employers in collective bargaining, union elections¬†and unfair labor practice proceedings under the National Labor Relations Act.¬†Recently, he¬†filed a brief before the U.S. Supreme Court arguing that employers should be allowed to require employees to waive their right to file class-action lawsuits or any other method of joining with others in seeking relief for rights violations. Emanuel has directly worked on numerous issues currently before the NLRB, raising serious questions about his ability to be impartial on those cases.
Kaplan hasn‚Äôt ever practiced labor law. His only related experience is in staffing a couple of Republican, anti-worker committees in Congress and helping run a series of oversight hearings criticizing the NLRB under President Barack Obama. He drafted legislation to overturn several NLRB actions that strengthened the freedom of working people join together. Like Emanuel, Kaplan has actively worked on numerous issues he would have to rule on if confirmed to the NLRB, calling into question his own impartiality on¬†those cases.
This blog was originally published at AFLCIO.org on July 11, 2017. Reprinted with permission.
About the Author: Kenneth Quinnell¬†is a long-time blogger, campaign staffer and political activist. Before joining the¬†AFL-CIO¬†in 2012, he worked as labor reporter for the blog¬†Crooks and Liars. Previous experience includes Communications Director for the¬†Darcy Burner¬†for Congress Campaign and New Media Director for the¬†Kendrick Meek¬†for Senate Campaign, founding and serving as the primary author for the influential state blog¬†Florida Progressive Coalition¬†and more than 10 years as a college instructor teaching political science and American History. His writings have also appeared on¬†Daily Kos,¬†Alternet, the¬†Guardian Online,¬†Media Matters for America,¬†Think Progress,¬†Campaign for America’s Future¬†and elsewhere.