In the film, â€śMonte Python and the Holy Grail,â€ť King Arthur severs both of the Black Knightâ€™s arms during a sword fight, but the Black Knight attempts to battle on.
The king admonishes him: â€śYouâ€™ve got no arms left.â€ť
The knight refutes that: â€śYes I have.â€ť
â€śLook,â€ť at the obvious, the king tells him.
â€śJust a flesh wound,â€ť retorts the knight, who clearly is suffering a state of denial.
Similarly, in the trade clash between China and America, the Asian giant has gravely wounded the United States. China knows it. U.S. voters of all political stripes know it. But too many American politicians, like the Black Knight, are in denial.
Their deliberate blindness, and resulting inaction, has enabled China to continue devaluing its currency, the Renminbi, against the dollar, a practice that makes its exports artificially cheap in U.S. markets and U.S. exports to China wrongfully overpriced. China announced just before the G-20 summit in Toronto that it would allow the value of the Renminbi to float up on world markets â€“ and then permitted the currency that is undervalued by as much as 40 percent against the dollar to rise an underwhelming one half of one percent.
Political inaction also has facilitated Chinaâ€™s flouting of international trade rules forbidding government subsidies to manufacturers. The Chinese subsidies result in falsely low-priced Chinese goods flooding U.S. markets and submerging U.S. manufacturers.
Main Street Americans see the obvious. They said so in a poll conducted late in April by The Mellman Group for the Alliance for American Manufacturing (AAM). The likely voters â€“ who identified themselves as Republican, Democrat, Tea Party and Independent â€“ said Washington must focus on manufacturing because it is crucial to Americaâ€™s economic strength. Large majorities said the U.S. should strengthen domestic manufacturing and develop a national manufacturing policy.
Unfortunately, too many politicians who loll in the rarefied world of Washington, D.C. — so far from Main Street, so very far from an actual factory — donâ€™t see it. So theyâ€™ve failed to solve the problems.
A report issued this week by the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) details the trade difficulties encountered by one American industry â€“ paper manufacturers. Its struggles mirror those that have maimed many other U.S. manufacturers, including pipe mills and tire plants.
The report, â€śNo Paper Tiger: Subsidies to Chinaâ€™s Paper Industry from 2002-09,â€ť notes that in 2008, China overtook the United States to become the worldâ€™s largest producer of paper and paper products. This score by China is the solid evidence for the gut feeling Americans expressed in the Mellman poll for AAM. A significant majority told the pollsters they believed the U.S. had lost to China the position of worldâ€™s strongest economy.
Americans didnâ€™t need a report to spell out for them what their families and neighborhoods had suffered over the past decade. Theyâ€™d experienced the closing of more than 10 percent of U.S. manufacturing plants in their communities from 2001 to 2009 â€“ a loss of 42,404 factories. In the paper industry alone, 159,000 of their relatives and neighbors lost their jobs as paper mills closed or cut production during the seven-year period covered by the â€śNo Paper Tigerâ€ť study.
A woman from Los Angeles told the Mellman pollsters that this relentless loss of manufacturing capability enfeebles America: â€śWhen you consume more than you produce, you become dependent, and we are consuming more from other countries than producing our own. . .truly we have become weak and in order to strengthen the economy, I think we need to produce more.â€ť
The U.S. will, however, continue to produce less, the â€śNo Paper Tigerâ€ť report makes clear, if Washington doesnâ€™t act against predators violating international regulations. The report explains that Chinaâ€™s government granted at least $33 billion in subsidies to paper manufacturers to accomplish the countryâ€™s rapid rise to global leader in paper production.
In its central government-controlled economy, China gives paper companies money and breaks, much of which is improper under international trade regulations. For example, some paper companies get â€śloansâ€ť that they donâ€™t have to repay. The government provides tax breaks, artificially low-priced electricity and underpriced raw materials. This explains how Chinese paper companies increased capacity by an average of 26 percent every year since 2004 even as prices for paper fell internationally and costs for raw materials for paper production in China rose steeply.
Chinaâ€™s rule-violating subsidies and deliberate currency devaluation explain the low price of Chinese paper. Labor costs donâ€™t account for it. Thatâ€™s because labor is such a tiny percentage of the price of paper â€“ in both the U.S. and China. In China, itâ€™s 4 percent of production cost; in the U.S. itâ€™s 8 percent.
By contrast, Chinese paper manufacturers confront expensive problems that the American industry does not. In China, obtaining raw materials for paper making is complicated and costly because the country has among the smallest forestry resources in the world per capita. In addition, the â€śNo Paper Tigerâ€ť report says, the Chinese industry is relatively inefficient. In the U.S., the paper industry is highly efficient and has easy access to abundant natural resources.
The U.S., a market economy, simply does not routinely prop up manufacturers the way China does.
The â€śNo Paper Tigerâ€ť report says that if nothing changes, U.S. paper manufacturers will continue to lose money, close mills and bleed jobs. The U.S. could be reduced to serving as nothing more than the supplier of raw materials for Chinese paper production, as if America were an undeveloped third world country incapable of manufacturing on its own.
Chinaâ€™s subsidization of its paper manufacturers isnâ€™t unique. It supports many of its industries. Chinese government intervention in the market accounts for a significant portion of the manufacturing loss in America. That loss diminishes American security.
America is losing her arms. Denying it doesnâ€™t help.
About The Author: Leo Gerard is the United Steelworkers International President. Under his leadership, the USW joined with Unite -the biggest union in the UK and Republic of Ireland â€“ to create Workers Uniting, the first global union. He has also helped pass legislation, including the landmark Canadian Westray Bill, making corporations criminally liable when they kill or seriously injure their employees or members of the public.