Colorado teachers are getting ready to join the wave of teacher walkouts to fight for pay raises and increased education fundingâ€”and two Republican lawmakersÂ want to jail the teachersÂ for their activism.
The bill,Â SB18-264, would prohibit public school teacher strikes by authorizing school districts to seek an injunction from district court. A failure to comply with the injunction would â€śconstitute contempt of courtâ€ť and teachers could face not only fines but up to six months in county jail, the bill language reads.
The bill also directs school districts to fire teachers on the spot without a proper hearing if theyâ€™re found in contempt of court and also bans public school teachers from getting paid â€śfor any day which the public school teacher participates in a strike.â€ť
Presumably state Rep. Paul Lundeen and state Sen. Bob GardnerÂ have not read the pollsÂ showing widespread support for teacher walkouts and an even more widespread sentiment that teachers are underpaid. Or maybe they have read the polls and they just donâ€™t care how unpopular their jail-the-teachers bill would be.
This blog was originally published at Daily Kos on April 23, 2018. Reprinted with permission.
About the Author: Laura ClawsonÂ is labor editor at Daily Kos.
The Labor Department issued a proposal on Monday that would rescind the union-buster transparency rule, officially known as the persuader rule, designed to increase disclosure requirements for consultants and attorneys hired by companies to try to persuade working people against coming together in a union. The rule was supposed to go into effect last year, but a court issued an injunction last June to prevent implementation. Now the Trump Labor Department wants to eliminate it.
We wrote about this rule last year. Repealing the union-buster transparency rule is little more than the administration doing the bidding of wealthy corporations and eliminating common-sense rules that would give important information to working people who are having roadblocks thrown their wayÂ while trying to form a union.
AFL-CIO spokesman Josh Goldstein said:
The persuader rule means corporate CEOs can no longer hide the shady groups they hire to take away the freedoms of working people. Repealing this common-sense rule is simply another giveaway to wealthy corporations. Corporate CEOs may not like people knowing who theyâ€™re paying to script their union-busting, but working people do.
If the rule is repealed, union-busters will be able to operate in the shadows as they work to take away our freedom to join together on the job. Working people deserve to know whether these shady firms are trying to influence them. The administration seems to disagree.
A 60-day public comment period opened Monday. Click on this link to leave a comment and tell the Labor Department that we should be doing more to ensure the freedom of working people to join together in a union, not less. Copy and paste the suggested text below if you need help getting started:
â€śWorking people deserve to know who is trying to block their freedom from joining together and forming a union on the job. Corporations spend big money on shadowy, outside firms that use fear tactics to intimidate and discourage people from coming together to make a better life on the job. I support a strong and robust persuader rule. Do not eliminate the persuader rule.â€ť
About the Author: Kenneth QuinnellÂ is a long-time blogger, campaign staffer and political activist.Â Before joining the AFL-CIO in 2012,Â heÂ worked as labor reporter for the blog Crooks and Liars.Â Previous experience includes Communications Director for the Darcy Burner for Congress Campaign and New Media Director for the Kendrick Meek for Senate Campaign, founding and serving as the primary author for the influential state blog Florida Progressive Coalition and more than 10 years as a college instructor teaching political science and American History.Â His writings have also appeared on Daily Kos, Alternet, the Guardian Online, Media Matters for America, Think Progress, Campaign for Americaâ€™s Future and elsewhere.