Students and faculty at Americaâ€™s colleges and universities stand at the confluence of many of the most troubled waters springing from the Trump administration and its corporate-driven, deeply divisive agenda.
Itâ€™s on these campuses that millions of young adults wonder whether theyâ€™ll still have health insurance if Obamacare is repealed. Itâ€™s here where those whose parents are undocumented immigrants may be forced to seek sanctuary. Hate incidents have spiked. The arts, science and intellectual freedom are under attack. Countless professors were ensnared by the administrationâ€™s ill-conceived travel ban.
This deluge is flooding a higher education system in which so many were already barely keeping their heads above water. Families canâ€™t afford to send their kids to college, student debt has skyrocketed and faculty in precarious jobs are earning so little, many must rely on public assistance to make ends meet.
Maybe itâ€™s not surprising, then, that college campuses are emerging as centers of resistance in these first weeks of Donald Trumpâ€™s presidency.
At the University of Chicago, we are standing up for part-time faculty who struggle to pay for healthcare and are in danger of their losing insurance. Elsewhere across the country there are marches, rallies and teach-ins. The energy surrounding the campus resistance movement is real and growing.
As a contingent professor of Hindi and the executive vice president of a labor union, the two of us have different vantage points as we observe whatâ€™s happening in our nation and on our campuses. However, we see the same forces at work. New Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos is unqualified and wrong for the job, which she has clearly demonstrated through her attacks on unionized workers and support for commoditized, corporatized higher education.
But college campuses are inherently optimistic places. Thatâ€™s why we can see past Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos. Itâ€™s why contingent faculty endure the challenges of the profession. Itâ€™s why graduate workers keep at it even when they are underpaid and overworked. Itâ€™s why students who wonder what kind of world theyâ€™ll graduate into are hitting the books harder than ever.
You canâ€™t keep people down who are thinking about the futureâ€”their own and that of our country. Itâ€™s why students and faculty who joined or applauded as millions of women marched the day after Trumpâ€™s inauguration have turned their attention to what they can do right where they are.
What they can doâ€”what they will do on todayâ€”is more than protest Trump, although itâ€™s essential that we resist and oppose his agenda. Faculty and students will rise up to and stress how important a strong higher education system is to the well-being of the nation.
Americans deserveâ€”and needâ€”colleges that are gateways to a lifetime of opportunity for students. Institutions that are once again cornerstones of local and regional economies, providing good, stable jobs that can sustain a family. Places where children of immigrant families can pursue the American Dream without worrying they will be dragged away. Homes to robust intellectual inquiry that advances science and nurtures the arts, uncompromised by the pressures of partisan politics.
This is why we and thousands of others are a part of the #CampusResistance — today and beyond.
This article was originally printed on SEIU.orgÂ in MarchÂ 2017Â . Â Reprinted withÂ permission.
Jason Grunebaum has been a contingent professor of Hindi at University of Chicago for 12 years.
Heather Conroy is an international executive vice president at the Service Employees International Union (SEIU).
December 5 fell on a Friday in 2014; in New York City, the air was crisp. At Columbia University, about 200 graduate student-workers pulled on hats and scarves to gather on the imposing steps of Low Library, which houses the university presidentâ€™s office. While most stood in a block formation, holding signs declaring their department names, a small delegation went inside to deliver a letter to the president. It asked that he voluntarily recognize their union, the Graduate Workers of Columbia (GWC-UAW Local 2110), which a majority of graduate employees supported.
When the administration declined to reply, GWC and the United Auto Workers (UAW), with which it is affiliated, petitioned the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to certify their union. A complicated legal process ensued.
For more than a decade, the NLRB considered graduate employees to be students, not workers. As such, they did not have the same legal rights of most employees, including the right to organize. All that changed two weeks ago when theÂ NLRB decision on the Columbia case finally came back, siding with the student-workers and their right to collective bargaining.
â€śObviously, itâ€™s a huge push for us and itâ€™s caused a lot of excitement and enthusiasm,â€ť says Ian Bradley-Perrin, a PhD student in sociomedical sciences and history, who has worked as both a teaching and research assistant.
After months of approaching people with hypotheticals, he says that he and his fellow organizers can now speak in concrete terms: â€śWeâ€™re going to have an election. We are now recognized as workers. So itâ€™s just been talking to people about what a union actually means, how the union is organized democratically, how peopleâ€™s interests will be represented in the union.â€ť
Graduate teaching and research assistants at a handful of private universities have been working towards unionization for years. Their administrations have largely been able to ignore their actions, citing the NLRBâ€™s designation of them as students. Now, however, their efforts can finally move forward. They have the legal right to hold union elections and then negotiate contracts, providing them a collective voice in the terms of their employment. Already, the NLRBâ€™s ruling is invigorating existing campaigns and inspiring new ones.
Path to recognition
Graduate employees at many public universities have long enjoyed the right to unionize, but their peers at private universities have faced a long, serpentine route to achieve that same right. In 2001, graduate employees at New York University (NYU) became the countryâ€™s first to form a union and negotiate a contract at a private university, providing teaching assistants with wage increases and improved working conditions.
Three years later, graduate employees at Brown University attempted to do the same, but the NLRB, which had then shifted to a Republican majority, ruled that graduate employees were primarily students, not workers. In 2005, the NYU unionâ€™s contract expired and, using the 2004 Brown decision as precedent, the administration refused to negotiate a new one.
NYUâ€™s administration kept firm to that stance until fall 2013, when it offered to voluntarily recognize the union. More than 98 percent of graduate employees voted in favor of the union, making it, once again, the only graduate employee union at a private university.
Organizers across the country were anxious to follow in their footsteps. Last monthâ€™s NLRB ruling gives them a shot in the arm.
At Harvard University, graduate student organizer Abigail Weil is particularly excited by the expansive way in which the NLRB defined a graduate employee in its ruling: â€śItâ€™s broader and more inclusive than even we had hoped for. Thatâ€™s just that many more people that we can talk to and fold into the bargaining unit as we create it.â€ť
In its decision, the NLRB writes, â€śIt is appropriate to extend statutory coverage to students working for universities covered by the (National Labor Relations) Act unless there are strong reasons not to do so.â€ť It continues, â€śWe will apply that standard to student assistants, including assistants engaged in research funded by external grants.â€ť Not only does this include research assistants in addition to teaching assistants, but, Weil posits, it could also be interpreted as including working Masters studentsâ€”and possibly even working undergraduates.
According to Weil, the Harvard Graduate Students Union (HGSU-UAW) plans to file a petition for an election. She can already see a change in campus support.
â€śWeâ€™re thrilled at how many people were following the NLRB story,â€ť she says. â€śSince that decision has come out, probably two-thirds of the people that we talk to now bring (it) up without us having to bring that up or explain it.â€ť
Organizers at The New School, in New York City, are experiencing a similar phenomenon.
Like at Columbia, graduate employees at The New School asked their administration to voluntarily recognize their union. When that didnâ€™t work, they too petitioned the NLRB for certification, only to hit the wall created a decade earlier by the Brown decision.
â€śWe had our first meeting of the year on Monday and we had probably three times as many people show up,â€ť says Eli Nadeau, a MastersÂ student in the politics department at The New School. â€śWeâ€™re planning for an election because Columbiaâ€™s ruling covers us.â€ť
Graduate workers at Cornell University took a slightly different approach to winning collective bargaining rights. While biding their time until the NLRB ruled on the Columbia case, they negotiated and signed a code of conduct with their administration in May. The document outlines the mechanisms by which a union election would take place and the behavior expected of both sides.
â€śOur next steps are really just working on the union. We are building outreach and finding out what our membersâ€™ concerns are,â€ť explains Ben Norton, a PhD student in the music department and the communications and outreach chair of Cornell Graduate Students United, the universityâ€™s graduate employee union affiliated with the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association.
â€śWe wasted no timeâ€ť
Campaigns on numerous campuses have been galvanized by the Columbia decision, but graduate employees at Yale University took perhaps the swiftest action in its wake. Less than a week after the ruling, they filed a petition to hold an election to certify their union with the NLRB.
â€śWe wasted no time. It was really exciting for the path to victory to open up and for us to really take advantage of it,â€ť says Aaron Greenberg, a PhD student in the political science department and chair of Local 33-UNITE HERE, which represents Yaleâ€™s graduate teaching and research assistants.
In filing their petition, UNITE HERE and organizers at Yale are creating yet another variation on a graduate employee union. Rather than file as an entire unit of employees across the university, they did so department-by-department, starting with 10 departments.
â€śWe really want a process that reflects how our work is organized. How much you get paid, what kind of work you do, what kind of hours you do really depend on the department,â€ť explains Greenberg. Plus, he adds, â€śWeâ€™re hoping that by filing each department separately and starting with departments where the desire to unionize is overwhelmingly clear, we can avoid wasteful legal gamesmanship, unnecessary delays, and that the university will respect the democratic will of the members of these departments, who have made clear, time and time again, that they want a union.â€ť
One of the next steps for graduate employees at many of the private universities hoping to take advantage of the recent NLRB decision will be working out the exact parameters of the bargaining unit: who it covers and who it excludes is not yet completely clear. But in the meantime, they will, for the first time in more than a decade, be able to move closer towards unionization without legal barriersâ€”barriers which, organizers believe, were knocked down by the force of the organizing that took place in those intervening years.
â€śLabor law follows organizing, not the other way around,â€ť says Weil. â€śWe have been organizing to the full extent of our abilities, not the full extent of our legal rights. Weâ€™re happy to have those rights restored.â€ť
This article was originally posted at InTheseTimes.comÂ on September 9,Â 2016. Reprinted with permission.
Rebecca Nathanson is a freelance writer in New York City. She has written for Al Jazeera America, n+1, The Nation, NewYorker.com,The Progressive, RollingStone.com, and more.
Share this post
Subscribe For Updates
Find an Employment Attorney
The Workplace Fairness Attorney Directory features lawyers from across the United States who primarily represent workers in employment cases. Please note that Workplace Fairness does not operate a lawyer referral service and does not provide legal advice, and that Workplace Fairness is not responsible for any advice that you receive from anyone, attorney or non-attorney, you may contact from this site.
Workplace Fairness is a non-profit organization working to preserve and promote employee rights. This site provides comprehensive information about job rights and employment issues nationally and in all 50 states. It is for workers, employers, advocates, policymakers, journalists, and anyone else who wants to understand, protect, and strengthen workersâ€™ rights. More about Workplace Fairness