Itâ€™s not justÂ immigration. Donald Trump plans to useÂ coronavirus as an excuse toÂ weaken environmental, labor, health, and other regulationsÂ in exactly the ways heâ€™s wanted toÂ all along. While the White House negotiates with Congress, including Democrats, over what the next round of coronavirus relief could look like, regulatory changes can be made without congressional approval.
The administration already decided not to enforce air quality standardsâ€”during a respiratory disease pandemic. Now, Trump and advisers like director of the United States National Economic Council Larry Kudlow, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, and incoming chief of staff Mark Meadows are talking about ideas like suspending regulations on small businessesâ€”an absolute invitation to wage theft and dangerous working conditions, among other thingsâ€”and â€śexpanding an existing administration program that requires agencies to revoke two regulations for every new one they issue,â€ť The Washington Post reports. Because nothing says â€śweâ€™re serious about making good policyâ€ť like arbitrary rules limiting what the government can do on a strictly numeric level.
â€śThis sounds exactly like the type of opportunistic political move that absolutely should not be attempted right now,â€ť Jared Bernstein, who was the chief economic adviser to Joe Biden during his time as vice president, told The Washington Post. â€śCorrelations between regulations and economic activity are far shakier than they assume, and I donâ€™t believe this idea will help at all.â€ť
According to Lisa Gilbert of Public Citizen, â€śall attention should be focused on improving the regulatory state to protect the public. We should be focused on the crisis at hand, not loosening standards.â€ť Thereâ€™s a great example of someone saying something that is 100% true and 100% not what is on the table in the current administration. Protecting the public? Ha ha. Focused on the crisis at hand rather than on loosening standardsâ€”indeed, rather than using the crisis as an excuse to loosen standards? Bitter laughter to infinity.
This blog was originally published at Daily Kos on April 21, 2020. Reprinted with permission.
About the Author: Laura Clawson is a Daily Kos contributor at Daily Kos editor since December 2006. Full-time staff since 2011, currently assistant managing editor.
Trump ran on a pledge to kill regulations, and focused much of his wrath on EPA climate rules such as the Clean Power Plan. Upon assuming office, he put in place a â€śfreezeâ€ť on all federal regulations; told business leaders â€śweâ€™re going to be cutting regulation massivelyâ€ť by 75 percent or â€śmaybe moreâ€ť; and told car company executives that environmental regulations are â€śout of control.â€ť
Yet, contrary to popular myth, regulations such as clean air and water standards do not have a net negative impact on job growth. Indeed, studies have found that the exact type of regulations Trump is targeting actually spur innovation and competitiveness.
As Bureau of Labor Statistics data make clear (above chart), the recent two-term presidents who were in favor of regulation, especially environmental regulation (Obama and Clinton) created vastly more net jobs than the anti-regulation Presidents (Reagan and George W. Bush). â€śBusinesses have added jobs at a nearly 2.5 times faster rate under Democrats than under Republicans, on average,â€ť the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee reported in June.
The multiple economic benefits of regulations are well documented. First, EPA regulations make companies invest money to reduce some of the damage that results from their operationâ€” such as polluting the air or water. That investment directly creates jobs, which generally cancel out any jobs lost by the cost imposed on the polluters.
Second, the reduction in harm itself boosts growthâ€”cleaner air, for instance, means fewer sick days lost to asthma or cardiopulmonary illness. Here, for instance, are the health and mortality benefits of EPA Clean Air Act programs since 1990 aimed at reducing fine particles and ozone levels:
EPA particulate regulations (PM2.5) alone are now saving some 200,000 lives a year. And the benefits to the economy of these health improvements are enormous. The loss in economic output due to restricted activity, sickness, and death is enormous.
Indeed, the 2016 â€śDraft Report to Congress on the Benefits and Costs of Federal Regulationsâ€ť by the Office of Management and Budget found that over the previous 10 years, EPAâ€™s air regulations cost the economy $41 to $48 billion (in 2014$) while providing benefits worth $172 to $668 billion.
The same report found that Energy Department efficiency standardsâ€”which Trump has also frozenâ€”cost the economy $7.5 to $10.6 billion but provided $19 to $32.6 billion in savings. And it found that the joint EPA and Transportation Department â€śrules pertaining to the control of greenhouse gas emissions from mobile sources and improved vehicle fuel economyâ€ť had costs of $9.5 to $18 billion and benefits worth $35 to $64 billion.
Third, beyond those direct costs and benefits, environmental regulations spur innovation. This was the key notion that Harvard Business School professor and competitiveness guru Michael Porter first suggested in the 1990s. Subsequent reviews of the economic literature on the so-called â€śPorter Hypothesisâ€ť confirmed he was right. Indeed, the most recent studies confirm Porterâ€™s broader theory that â€śstricter regulation enhances business performance.â€ť
Itâ€™s worth noting that a comprehensive peer-reviewed analysis of the performance of the U.S. economy in the past six decades found that â€śgrowth in total factor productivity was much faster under Democrats (1.89 percent versus 0.84 percent for Republicans).â€ť So if anyoneâ€™s policies are hurting productivity, it would appear to be the GOPâ€™s.
Finally, in the coming decades, the ever-worsening reality of climate change will ensure that the primary new manufacturing jobs will be green and sustainable. In 2010, the New York Times reported â€śin the energy sector alone, the deployment of new technologies, like wind and solar power, has the potential to support 20 million jobs by 2030 and trillions of dollars in revenue, analysts estimate.â€ť
The Paris climate dealâ€”unanimously agreed upon by 190 nations in December 2015â€”means that the potential revenues generated for cleantech in the coming decades will be measured in the tens of trillions of dollars.
This potential is quickly becoming a reality. Other countries, especially China, have used regulations and investment to become leaders in clean energy technologies like solar and wind. And now China is using the same strategy with batteries and electric vehicles (EVs) to capture what is projected to be an EV market of more than 37 million in 2025.
But Trump intends to kill the very policies and regulations that would give the U.S. a piece of what is becoming the largest collection of new job-creating industries.
So, tragically, Trumpâ€™s war on regulations will not only kill countless U.S. jobs, it will kill a lot of people.
This post appeared originally in Think Progress on JanuaryÂ 25, 2017. Reprinted with permission.
Dr. Joe Romm is a Fellow at American Progress and is the founding editor of Climate Progress, whichÂ New York Times columnist Tom Friedman called â€śthe indispensable blogâ€ť and Time magazine named one of the 25 â€śBest Blogs of 2010.” In 2009,Â Rolling Stone put Romm #88 on its list of 100 â€śpeople who are reinventing America.â€ťÂ Time named him a â€śHero of the Environment? and â€śThe Webâ€™s most influential climate-change blogger.â€ť Romm was acting assistant secretary of energy for energy efficiency and renewable energy in 1997, where he oversaw $1 billion in R&D, demonstration, and deployment of low-carbon technology. He holds a Ph.D. in physics from MIT.
Share this post
Subscribe For Updates
Find an Employment Attorney
The Workplace Fairness Attorney Directory features lawyers from across the United States who primarily represent workers in employment cases. Please note that Workplace Fairness does not operate a lawyer referral service and does not provide legal advice, and that Workplace Fairness is not responsible for any advice that you receive from anyone, attorney or non-attorney, you may contact from this site.
Workplace Fairness is a non-profit organization working to preserve and promote employee rights. This site provides comprehensive information about job rights and employment issues nationally and in all 50 states. It is for workers, employers, advocates, policymakers, journalists, and anyone else who wants to understand, protect, and strengthen workersâ€™ rights. More about Workplace Fairness