In his economic policy speech on Monday, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump is expected to announce a new policy: allowing families to fully deduct the cost of their childcare expenses from their taxes.
The announcement will mark Trumpâ€™s first foray into work/family issues and follows up on his daughter Ivankaâ€™s promise during the Republican National Convention that he â€świll focus on making quality childcare affordable and accessible for all.â€ť But experts say that his plan will do nothing to help low- or even middle-income families, instead solely benefitting the rich who least need help affording child care.
â€śItâ€™s absolutely regressive,â€ť said Helen Blank, director of childcare and early learning at the National Womenâ€™s Law Center.
â€śItâ€™s absolutely regressive.â€ť
Tax deductions benefit the wealthy, who usually owe more come April 15. A deduction helps them reduce that amount. But many low-income families donâ€™t owe anything in income taxes because they make too little and qualify for credits that reduce or erase their burdens. Currently, 35 percent of all people filing taxes donâ€™t have a liability come tax time, and Trump has said he wants to significantly expand that number.
Itâ€™s the lower- and middle-income families, however, who are paying the greatest share of their income for childcare. Families who live in poverty spend over a third of their monthly income on it, while those living just above the poverty line spend about 20 percent, according to Katie Hamm, senior director for early childhood policy at the Center for American Progress. (ThinkProgress is an editorially independent project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.) Everyone who makes more, however, spends less than 10 percent of their income on average.
Meanwhile, if childcare expenses are fully deductible with no cap at all, the more a family spends on child care the more it benefits. â€śFor folks who are in the upper earning bracket, who have a higher tax rate to begin with, and who are paying more money to have child care options like au pairs for example, those people are likely to receive large cost savings,â€ť said Sarah Jane Glynn, director of womenâ€™s economic policy at the Center for American Progress. â€śWhereas a single working mom who makes around the minimum wage is going to get nothing out of this.â€ť
Speaking of Trump, she added, â€śIt would really help people like him and not help anybody else.â€ť
The country has already tried a child care tax deduction and decided it didnâ€™t work. â€śWe had a tax deduction until the late 70s,â€ť Blank said. â€śThe deduction was made into a credit because a credit is more equitable.â€ť A low-income family can take advantage of a credit, especially if itâ€™s refundable, which allows it to get money back at tax time even if it doesnâ€™t have a tax liability.
The tax code is also a poor tool for easing the burden of increasingly unaffordable child care. Even if it were to help lower-income families, they would only get the benefit of their tax return once a year in a lump sum. But child care expenses are ongoing, bills that usually have to be paid monthly or even weekly.
â€śIt would really help people like him and not help anybody else.â€ť
This article was originally posted at Thinkprogress.org on August 8, 2016. Reprinted with permission.
Bryce CovertÂ is the Economic Policy Editor for ThinkProgress. Her writing has appeared in the New York Times, The New York Daily News, New York Magazine, Slate, The New Republic, and others. She has appeared on ABC, CBS, MSNBC, and other outlets.