On Tuesday,Â BuzzFeed reportedÂ that numerous woman on the staff of Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) say the congressman repeatedly sexually harassed them. Conyersâ€™ conduct allegedly included â€śrequests for sexual favorsâ€¦caressing their hands sexually, and rubbing their legs and backs in public.â€ť In at least one case, a woman who rebuffed Conyersâ€™ advances says she was fired.
Yet until last night, Conyersâ€™ behavior was secret. Why? There is no better place to be a sexual predator than the U.S. Congress.
Congress has created an elaborate system that protects sexual predators on Capitol Hill, including members of Congress and their staff. In the private sector and elsewhere in the government, victims of sexual harassment have the option of immediately filing a lawsuit and getting their grievances heard in court. But Congress has created a much different set of rules for victims who work on Capitol Hill.
The 180-day statute of limitations to request â€ścounselingâ€ť
In order to pursue accountability for a sitting member of Congress for an alleged incident of sexual harassment or assault, a victim must file a written notice with the Office of Compliance within 180 days of the incident. If they donâ€™t act within 180 days, they have no ability to pursue their claims. As reporting on Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby and others reveals, it can take years for victims to feel comfortable coming forward.
Furthermore, the form to file such a complaint is password protected; a victim must call the Office of Compliance to get the password to initiate the process.
The 30-day â€ścounselingâ€ť period
After filing the complaint, the person alleging harassment or assault must participate in a 30-day counseling period. Yes, in Congress, theÂ victimsÂ of sexual harassment must submit to counseling, as if there is something wrong withÂ them. During this period, no one else â€” including the alleged harasser â€” is even notified the complaint has been filed.
The Office of Compliance puts a sunny face on this process, saying it â€śprovides the employee withÂ an opportunityÂ to assess his/her case before deciding whether to pursue the claim(s) beyond counseling.â€ť In other words, the process starts with a 30-day waiting period in which the victim is given the â€śopportunityâ€ť to consider dropping the entire matter.
The 15-day statute of limitations to request mediation
After going through the counseling process, the alleged victim has just 15 days to file a request for mediation. If they fail to do so, the claim is extinguished. The form to request mediation is also password protected and must be obtained from the Office of Compliance.
The 30-day mediation period
After the counseling process, the alleged victim is still prohibited from filing a case in court. Rather, they must enter mandatory, confidential mediation which lasts at least another 30 days. The mediation period involves â€śthe employing office, employee, and [Office of Compliance] mediator.â€ť The purpose of the mediation, according to the Office of Compliance, is to â€śresolve the dispute.â€ť
The individual alleging harassment or assault is also required to keep this mediation secret. â€śAll mediation shall be strictly confidential, and the Executive Director shall notify each person participating in the mediation of the confidentiality requirement and of the sanctions applicable to any person who violates the confidentiality requirement,â€ť according to the poorly namedÂ Congressional Accountability Act, which governs the process. The alleged perpetrator may not even be involved in this process, even if the claim is settled. John Conyers, whose case was settled through mediation,Â claimed he was unaware of any allegations against himÂ â€” although sources tell BuzzFeed he did know.
There are also indications of misconduct within the Office of Compliance. Conyersâ€™ settlement was confidential but documents were leaked by someone to Mike Cernovich, a right-wing conspiracy theorist and professional misogynist, who shared the documents with BuzzFeed.
The taxpayer-funded sexual harassment settlement
As part of the mediation process, the parties can reach a settlement to resolve the dispute. But this settlement is not paid by the person who actually conducted the sexual harassment. Rather, the settlement is paid by you, the taxpayer. â€ś[O]nlyÂ funds which are appropriated to an account of the Office inÂ the Treasury of the United States for the payment of awardsÂ and settlements may be used for the payment of awards andÂ settlements under this chapter,â€ť theÂ Congressional Accountability Actstates.Â This is why Conyers did not have to pay a penny of his own money to settle claims against his alleged victims.
According to the Washington Post, the Office of ComplianceÂ has paid more than $17 millionÂ over the past two decades to settle complaints regarding violations of workplace rules, including but not limited to sexual harassment cases. ButÂ BuzzFeedâ€™s reportingÂ indicates this doesnâ€™t get at the scope of the problem. At least one settlement with a woman who alleged Conyers harassed her was paid from Conyersâ€™ office budget, not from the Office of Compliance.
The 30-day waiting period and 60-day statute of limitations for filing a complaint
After making it through counseling and mediation, the victim must wait 30 days before doing anything. Itâ€™s unclear what this waiting period is for, other than to pressure the victim to accept a settlement offer or drop the claim. The victim then has just 60 days to either file an administrative complaint with the Office of Compliance or file a case in federal district court. The form to file an administrative complaint is also password protected. If the victim does not take any action within 90 days of the end of mediation, the claim is extinguished.
The secret administrative hearing
The administrative proceeding, unlike a federal court case, is also confidential and presents another opportunity for a perpetrator to keep the allegations secret. The hearings are closed to the public. (The hearing officer is empowered to dismiss any claim without a hearing if he or she judges the claim to be â€śfrivolous.â€ť) The responding party is not the individual that engaged in sexual harassment, but the office that employed that person. A record of the proceedings are only made public if the victim is successful.
If the victim disagrees with the decision, he or she must appeal first to the board of the Office of Compliance. After the Office of Compliance issue their decision, the victim may appeal to theÂ United States Court of Appeals for the FederalÂ Circuit. That means there will be no independent evaluation of the evidence, rather the appeals court simply reviews for arbitrary or capricious application of the law, a very high legal standard.
If the victim wins in the administrative hearing, the payment is made from taxpayer money. They are not entitled to receive civil penalties or punitive damages under the law. This keeps both the awards and the settlements fairly low. Over 20 years, Congress has paidÂ $17.1 million to 264 victims, a figure that includes sexual harassment and other forms of discrimination â€” an average award of about $65,000.
A federal case against a congressional office, not the person engaging in sexual harassment
After all this, a victim still cannot sue a member of Congress or other staff member who engaged in sexual harassment. Rather, if a victim choses to forgo the administrative hearing, he or she can file a federal case against the office where the sexual harassment allegedly occurred. In this case, victims are still not entitled to civil penalties or punitive damages. This makes the choice to file a suit, in most cases, prohibitively expensive since even a successful case will not bring in a large award.
Whatever money is awarded still is not paid by the sexual harasser but by taxpayers.
WithÂ more recent scrutinyÂ on the systems in place to hold accountable powerful men accused of assault and harassment, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Rep. Jackie Speier (D-CA) recentlyÂ introduced legislation to reform this process. Their bill would make counseling and mediation optional. It would also require hearings to be completed within 180 days after the complaint is filed. Complaints under the new legislation could also be filed anonymously. Members of Congress who personally engage in sexual harassment would be required to pay their own settlements and awards, rather than using taxpayer funds for this purpose.
The proposed bill â€” called the Member and Employee Training and Oversight On Congress Act, or ME TOO Congress â€” still requires an administrative complaint or civil action to be filed 180 days after the alleged incident.
Gillibrand and Speierâ€™s bill has attracted three co-sponsors in the Senate and five in the House. All of Gillibrandâ€™s co-sponsors are Democratic women. Speierâ€™s co-sponsors include three Republican men.
This article was published at ThinkProgress on November 21, 2017. Reprinted with permission.Â
About the Author: JuddÂ LegumÂ is the founder and editor in chief of ThinkProgress